If you run a therapy practice, the choice between 90837 vs. 90834 probably shows up on nearly every claim you submit — and it’s one of the easiest places to lose revenue without realizing it. Bill 90834 for a 60-minute session and you leave roughly a third of the reimbursement on the table. Bill 90837 for every session regardless of length and you invite payer audits that claw back thousands. Getting this right is a core part of sound medical billing services for behavioral health, and it starts with the time thresholds.
Here’s the practical, 2026-accurate breakdown: what each code means, exactly what documentation each requires, the denial triggers that cost therapy practices the most, and how telehealth modifiers pair with each code.
Both codes describe individual psychotherapy with the patient (and/or family member). The difference is session length:
The rule is “closest to, past the halfway mark”: a 45-minute session clears the 38-minute threshold for 90834, and a 60-minute session clears the 53-minute threshold for 90837. (For reference, 90832 covers 30-minute sessions of 16–37 minutes.) Note the thresholds, not the face-time labels — a “45-minute session” that runs 55 minutes should be coded 90837, and a “60-minute session” that ends at 50 minutes is 90834.
| Detail | CPT 90834 | CPT 90837 |
|---|---|---|
| Descriptor | Psychotherapy, 45 minutes | Psychotherapy, 60 minutes |
| Billable time range | 38–52 minutes | 53 minutes and up |
| Work RVU | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Typical 2026 Medicare non-facility payment (national average; varies by locality) | ~$100 | ~$150 |
| Difference per session | Roughly $50 — about a 50% higher payment for 90837 | |
That ~$50 gap is why the code choice matters financially. A therapist seeing 25 patients a week who routinely downcodes 60-minute sessions to 90834 loses roughly $1,250 per week — over $60,000 a year. But the gap also explains why payers scrutinize 90837 heavily, which brings us to documentation.

The documentation requirements are the same for both codes, but the stakes are higher for 90837 because payers audit it more often. Every therapy note should include:
Practical tip: build a note template that auto-prompts for start/stop times and a one-line “why this length” field. Practices that standardize this see far fewer 90837 denials on review.
Four patterns account for most therapy-code denials — and most are preventable:
Denial rates run higher in behavioral health than in most specialties. If denials are a recurring problem, see our guide to behavioral health claim denials and the 7 fixes for therapy practices.
Yes — both codes are fully billable via telehealth, and the time thresholds are identical. What changes is the modifier and place-of-service coding:
Start/stop times matter even more for telehealth, since there’s no office-visit record to corroborate duration. Your EHR or video platform timestamps should match the note.

No. The threshold for 90837 is 53 minutes or longer. A 50-minute session falls in the 38–52 minute range and must be billed as 90834. Billing 90837 below the threshold is upcoding, even if your schedule calls it a “60-minute slot.”
Payers routinely flag providers whose 90837 share is disproportionate (often cited around 50%+ of sessions). Expect medical-record requests, downcoding, and possible recoupment. Only bill 90837 when sessions genuinely last 53+ minutes and the notes prove it.
Yes. The interactive-complexity add-on (+90785) can be appended to 90837 (and 90834) when specific complexity factors complicate delivery of the psychotherapy, such as managing maladaptive communication or caregiver involvement. It requires its own documentation.
Neither is “better” — the code follows session length, not modality. Use modifier 95 and the correct place of service (02 or 10). The reimbursement difference between the two codes applies the same way on telehealth claims.
90837 pays roughly 50% more — around $150 vs. around $100 under 2026 Medicare national averages, varying by locality and payer. The difference reflects the 3.00 vs. 2.00 work RVUs.
The 90837 vs. 90834 decision looks small, but multiplied across hundreds of sessions it’s one of the highest-leverage coding choices in a therapy practice — and one of the most audited. If your 90837 rate is high, your denials are climbing, or you’re not sure your notes would survive a payer review, get a second set of eyes before an auditor forces the issue.
Request a free behavioral health billing review — we’ll check your code mix, denial patterns, and documentation against what payers actually require.
Leave a comment